The term "Ultra Vires" is Latin for "beyond powers." The Doctrine of Ultra Vires states that:
π A company must act within the powers granted by its Memorandum of Association (MoA).
π Any act beyond the scope of the MoA is considered Ultra Vires (invalid and void).
π Shareholders, directors, or even third parties cannot ratify Ultra Vires acts.
πΉ Example: If the MoA states that a company can only manufacture textiles but it starts a real estate business, such an act is Ultra Vires and illegal.
π Section 4(1)(c): Object Clause in MoA
Defines the scope of activities a company can legally undertake.
π Section 245: Oppression & Mismanagement
Shareholders can file a suit if the company indulges in Ultra Vires acts.
π Section 271: Grounds for Winding Up
A company can be compulsorily wound up if it acts beyond its powers.
π Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co. Ltd. v. Riche (1875) LR 7 HL 653
Facts: The company was formed to manufacture railway carriages but entered into a railway financing contract.
Held: The contract was Ultra Vires and void, as it was beyond the companyβs MoA.
π Attorney-General v. Great Eastern Railway Co. (1880) 5 AC 473
Held: A company can only perform acts expressly stated in its MoA and those reasonably necessary for its operations.
π A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar v. Life Insurance Corporation of India, AIR 1963 SC 1185
Facts: A company donated a large sum to a charity, even though its MoA did not permit it.
Held: The donation was Ultra Vires and void, as it was beyond the company's object clause.
π J.K. Industries Ltd. v. Chief Inspector of Factories, (1996) 6 SCC 665
The Supreme Court ruled that statutory compliance cannot be avoided using the Ultra Vires doctrine.
π Re. Jon Beauforte (1953) Ch 131
Facts: A company engaged in ultra vires activities and then went insolvent.
Held: Creditors could not recover money, as the transactions were void from the beginning.
π¨ Acts beyond the companyβs stated objects in the MoA are completely void and cannot be ratified.
π Case: Ashbury Railway Co. v. Riche (1875) LR 7 HL 653
π¨ Acts beyond the powers in the AoA can be ratified by shareholders.
π Case: Hickman v. Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders' Association (1915) 1 Ch 881
π¨ If directors act beyond their powers, the company may approve or reject the act.
π Case: Bharat Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Kanhaiya Lal, AIR 1935 Lah 792
π¨ If an act violates the Companies Act, 2013, it is illegal and void.
π Case: Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction Co. (1996) 4 SCC 622
β
Void from the Beginning β Cannot be ratified even if all shareholders agree.
β
No Legal Enforceability β Third parties cannot enforce an Ultra Vires contract.
β
Personal Liability on Directors β If directors engage in Ultra Vires acts, they may be personally liable.
β
Injunction Possible β Shareholders can stop Ultra Vires acts through a court order.
Imagine "XYZ Ltd" is registered to manufacture electronic goods. If:
π¨ The directors decide to start a restaurant, this is Ultra Vires.
π¨ Any contracts signed for the restaurant are void.
π¨ Shareholders cannot approve this decision.
Thus, Ultra Vires acts are invalid, protecting investors and creditors from unauthorized risks.
β Conclusion
The Doctrine of Ultra Vires protects shareholders and creditors by ensuring companies operate within their stated objectives. Any act beyond the MoA is illegal and unenforceable, ensuring that a company stays true to its purpose.